My name is not Khan

I am not writing anything but just doing Crtl+P today:
My name is not Khan, I am Mr Kaul Tarun Vijay,
22 December 2009, 08:55 AM IST

I am not Khan. My name bears a different set of four letters: K A U L. Kaul. As those who know Indian names would understand I happened to be born in a family which was called Hindu by others. Hence, we were sure, we would never get a friend like KJ to make a movie on our humiliations, and the contemptuous and forced exile from our homeland.
It's not fashionable. It's fashionable to get a Khan as a friend and portray his agony and pains and sufferings when he is asked by a US private to take off his shoes and show his socks. Natural and quite
justifiable that Khan must feel insulted and enraged. Enough Masala to make a movie.

But unfortunately I am a Kaul. I am not a Khan.

Hence when my sisters and mothers were raped and killed, when six-year-old Seema was witness to the brutal slaughtering of her brother, mother and father with a butcher's knife by a Khan, nobody
ever came to make a movie on my agony, pain and anguish, and tears.

No KJ would make a movie on Kashmiri Hindus. Because we are not Khans. We are Kauls.

When we look at our own selves as Kauls, we also see a macabre dance of leaders who people Parliament. Some of them were really concerned about us. They got the bungalows and acres of greenery and had their portraits were worshipped by the gullible devotees of patriotism.

They made reservations in schools and colleges for us. In many many other states. But never did they try that we go back to our homes. They have other priorities and 'love your jihadi neighborhood'
programmes. They get flabbier and flabbier with the passing of each year, sit on sacks of sermons; issue instructions to live simply and follow moral principles delivered by ancestors and kept in documents treated with time-tested preservatives.

They could play with me because my name is Kaul. And not Mr Khan. I saw the trailer to this fabulous movie, which must do good business at the box office.

There was not even a hint that terror is bad and it is worse if it is perpetuated in the name of a religion that means Peace. Peace be upon all its followers and all other the creatures too.

So you make a movie on the humiliation of taking off shoes to a foreign police force which has decided not to allow another 9/11.

The humiliation of taking off the shoes and the urge to show that you are innocent is really too deep. But what about the humiliation of leaving your home and hearth and the world and the relatives and wife
and mother and father? And being forced to live in shabby tents, at the mercy of nincompoop leaders encashing your misery and bribe-seeking babus? And seeing your daughters growing up too sudden and finding no place to hide your shame? No KJ would ever come forward to make a movie, a telling,
spine-chilling narration on the celluloid, of five-year-old Seema, who saw her parents and brother being slaughtered by a butcher's knife in
Doda. Because her dad was not Mr Khan. He was one Mr Kaul.

Sorry, Mr Kaul and your entire ilk. I can't help you.

It's not fashionable to side with those who are Kauls. And Rainas. And Bhatts. Dismissively called KPs. KPs means Kashmiri Pandits. They are a bunch of communalists. They were the agents of one Mr Jagmohan who planned their exodus so that Khans can be blamed falsely. In fact, a movie can be made on how these KPs conspired their own exile to give a bad name to the loving and affectionate Khan brothers of the valley.

To voice the woes of Kauls is sinful. The right course to get counted in the lists of the Prime Minister's banquets and the President's parties is to announce from the roof top: hey, men and ladies, I am Mr
Khan.

The biggest apartheid the state observes is to exclude those who cry for Kauls, wear the colours of Ayodhya, love the wisdom of the civilisational heritage, dare to assert as Hindus in a land which is
known as Hindustan too and struggle to live with dignity as Kauls. They are out and exiled. You can see any list of honours and invites to summits and late-evening gala parties to toast a new brand. All
that the Kauls are allowed is a space at Jantar Mantar: shout, weep and go back to your tents after a tiring demonstration. Mr Kaul, you have got a wrong name.

A dozen KJs would fly to take you atop the glory - posts and gardens of sympathies if you accept to wear a Khan name and love a Sunita, Pranita, Komal or a Kamini. Well, here you have a sweetheart in
Mandira. That goes well with the story.

And you pegged the movie plot on autism.

I wept. It was too much. I wept as a father of a son who needed a story as an Indian. Who cares for his autistic son, his relationship with the western world, his love affair with a young sweet something as a human, as someone whose heart goes beyond being a Hindu, a Muslim or a proselytizing Vatican-centric aggressive soul. Not the one who would declare in newspaper interviews: "I think I am an ambassador for Islam". Shah Rukh is Shah Rukh, not because he is an ambassador for Islam. If that was true, he could have found a room in Deoband. Fine enough. But he became a heartthrob and a famousl star because he is a great actor. He owes everything he has to Indians and not just to Muslims. We love him not because he is some Mr Khan. We love him because he has portrayed the dreams, aspirations, pains, anguish and ups and downs of our daily life. As an Indian. As one of us.
If he wants to use our goodwill and love for strengthening his image as an ambassador for Islam, will we have to think to put up an ambassador for Hindus? That, at least to me, would be unacceptable
because I trust everyone: a Khan or a Kaul or a Singh or a Victor. Who represents India represents us all too, including Hindus. My best ambassadorship would be an ambassadorship for the tricolour and not for anything else because I see my Ram and Dharma in that. I don't think even an Amitabh or a Hritik would ever think in terms Shah Rukh has chosen for himself. But shouldn't these big, tall, successful Indians who wear Hindu names make a movie on why Kauls were ousted? Why Godhra occurred in the first place? Why nobody, yes, not a single Muslim, comes forward to take up the cause of the exiled and killed and contemptuously marginalized Kauls whereas every Muslim complainant would have essentially a Hindu advocate to take on Hindus as fiercely as he can?

If you are Mr Khan and found dead on the railway tracks, the entire nation would be shaken. And he was also a Rizwan. May be just a coincidence that our Mr Khan in the movie is also a Rizwan.

Rizwan's death saw the police commissioner punished and cover stories written by missionary writers. But if you are a Sharma or a Kaul and happened to love an Ameena Yusuf in Srinagar, you would soon find your corpse inside the police thana and NONE, not even a small-time local paper would find it worthwhile to waste a column on you. No police constable would be asked to explain how a wrongly detained person was found dead in police custody?

Because the lover found dead inside a police thana was not Mr Khan. No KJ would ever come forward to make a movie on 'My name is Kaul. And I am terror-struck by Khans'.

Give me back my identity as an Indian, Mr Khan and I would have no problem even wearing your name and appreciating the tender love of an autistic son.

We owe a lot to ADOLF HITLER...

Have you ever thought that the person which the whole world loves to hate a lot has affected the life of everyone born on this planet.
He is directly for some of the greatest inventions of the world which would have taken years to develop if He would have not been there..e.g. The Jet engine, Rockets,Submarine and of course the invention to end all inventions: Atom Bomb...
you might say that these are all weapons of distructions..agree but think a world without them..
You would have to wait for years for commercial air travels, deep sea explorations would have been a fantasy for long..and nuclear power plants...and why are you forgetting space explorations.

Anyway world owes or not we Indians as per me do owe a lot to him...OUR FREEDOM.
how..he was the one who weakened the British empire so much that it was not able to control its territories and we cannot hide the fact that he helped in the raising of INA which resulted a disloyalty in the Indian troops towards their British rulers. but all these facts are never being thought of because we were busy in praying to few people.
anyway the best part of this country is you have freedom of expression so you can agree to disagree with me..but I AM FORCED TO THINK.

Why does a soldier fights.........

Patriotism is just something the media has overhyped..thats not why the soldiers fight..
they dont want medals...
they dont want to be heroes...
they want to go back home alive....
they fight for the soldier beside them..
they fight for each other.
they fight for their families.
but this TV-Patriotism...which comes when a soldier dies in valley or in North-east comes for a day...the tears of their dear ones are sold in the market of reality TV.

We watch it and pity but have we ever thought that the persons who are doing so are really being taken care of...then we use the most famous dialogue
" NO BODY FORCED YOU TO JOIN ARMY" and our part is done.
Just think that if that be the case be sure one day who will defend you..
Yes they are forced to join for food,medicines,money for their families.
The main chunk of the fighting forces comes from far flung areas across the nation..yes they are forced to join..
These people don't require your sympathy but only your simple will to ask GOVT that are they doing enough for them.....
no matter what it be...They will be fighting for you...a request if you see one salute him....
Coz of their NEVER SAY DIE ATTITUDE..I M FORCED TO THINK

if a species is not endangered..it is ok to kill them

When we can raise your voice for 735 Muslims killed in Gujarat, we must cry from the rooftops for the 250,000 Kashmiri Pandits forced out of their homes in Kashmir. Why do we not?
well it is just because we are suffering from a disease better known as PSEUDO-SECULARISM.
we are not aware and talking about hindus suffering is like being non secular.So to just to keep ourself as secular we are ready to neglegt our own brothers and this thing is really creeped inside us.
well I AM FORCED TO THINK

Do you know Capt Deepak Sharma.........

"He was offered a job by Sony Ericsson, but he decided to join the Army instead. I told him you won't earn any money. But he was obstinate, he said it was a matter of pride," recalled Naresh Sharma, his voice raspy with tears.

Sharma's only son, 26-year-old Captain Deepak Sharma, was killed in a firefight with militants in Dadsar in South Kashmir yesterday.

And in Rohtak today, it appeared as if the entire town had descended on the Sharma residence to offer condolences. Scores of men in Army fatigues lined the street that led to the house — Deepak's body arrived this evening from Delhi.

Only twenty days ago, Deepak got engaged to Captain Manju who is undergoing training in Jabalpur. They were to be married in November.

"He was doing an MBA through correspondence and was home on a one-month leave because he had to appear for his exams. It was then that his family arranged his engagement with Manju. He was thrilled about it," said Amardeep Malik who went to school with Deepak and became one of his closest friends.

Deepak's mother Indu Sharma is inconsolable while his grandmother Angoori Devi has a vacant look in her eyes. "He is very young. How can he possibly die?" she asked those around her.

"My son never let on that he was working in dangerous conditions. He would always say everything is peaceful... he did not want us to worry. Sometimes, he would answer the phone only to say he was very busy. Those were the times that worried me most because I felt he was in danger," said father Naresh.

And the last time he spoke to his son was a few minutes after the gun-battle began. "I am busy," said Deepak and hung up. "

On 4 march 2010,this brave fellow laid down his life fighting terrorist ..he took 14 bullets and killed two......

now thats the story...the question is why he had to do this..just for some people for whom it does not make any difference,for this country which forgets to remember Vijay diwas but remembers rakhi sawant...A Civilisation which forgets its Matyrs will not survive long..I M FORCED TO THINK

Why are Manuwadi's opposing Mayawati?

Once Himwant was very much sad about his life(regarding marriage infact)...suddenly Narad muni appeared out of nowhere and asked him the reason. On listening the complete story he told............

कह मुनिस हिमवंत सुनु जो कुछ लिखे लिलार
देव दनुज नर नाग मुनि कोऊ न मेटनिहार
नारद जी ने कहा के हे हिमवान सुनो जो कुछ तुम्हारे ललाट पर लिखा है उसे देवता, दानव, नर , नाग , मुनि कोई नहीं मिटा सकता.

The people around got to accept the winds of change which is sweeping the gigantic planes after the agricultural revolutions..............but the narrow thinking makes them totally confined to their set of ideas,at least we must praise Mayawati for her public display of wealth because today no other politician can dare to do such act..forget about repeating it again..indeed this is a symbol of her truthfulness...so kudos to her......after all:
काहू न कोऊ सुख दुःख कर दाता
निज कृत करम भोग सब भ्राता
कोई किसी को सुख दुःख देने वाला नहीं होता , सब अपने किये कर्मों का फल भोगते हैं .
but people are still opposing her...I M REALLY FORCED TO THINK